Loading…
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that signs and gestures made by a witness constitute valid 'oral evidence' under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
This significant interpretation was made while upholding the conviction of a man in a rape case involving a disabled survivor who communicated non-verbally.
The court emphasized the importance of adopting demonstrative methods during trial to ensure accurate recording of testimony from vulnerable witnesses.
The ruling reinforces the principle of inclusive justice and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities within the legal system.
Oral evidence refers to all statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry. Traditionally, this implied spoken words. The Chhattisgarh High Court's ruling expands this definition to explicitly include non-verbal communication like signs and gestures, particularly from witnesses unable to speak.
Simple Analogy: Imagine a witness describing an event. If they speak, it's oral evidence. If they use sign language or point to objects to convey the same information, this ruling says that too is oral evidence, as long as it's understood and recorded properly.
Section 118 of this Act deals with who may testify (competency of witnesses). The High Court's ruling provides a crucial interpretation of this section, clarifying that the inability to speak verbally does not render a witness incompetent, and their non-verbal communication can be treated as oral evidence.
This Act mandates reasonable accommodation and accessibility for persons with disabilities. The court's decision aligns with the spirit of this Act by ensuring that judicial procedures are adapted to facilitate the testimony of disabled individuals, upholding their right to justice.
High Courts are the principal civil courts of original jurisdiction in each state and union territory. They also exercise appellate jurisdiction over lower courts and have the power of judicial review, including interpreting laws and safeguarding fundamental rights. Their judgments, like this one, set precedents within their jurisdiction and can influence legal interpretation nationwide.
GS-II: Indian Polity (Judiciary, Constitutional interpretation), Social Justice (Vulnerable sections, Rights of PwDs).
General Awareness: Indian Legal System, Important Acts.
General Awareness: Basic legal concepts.
General Awareness: Basic legal concepts.
General Awareness: Basic legal concepts.
With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements: 1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. 2. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Answer: Both 1 and 2
With reference to the Constitution of India, consider the following statements: 1. No High Court shall have the jurisdiction to declare any central law to be constitutionally invalid. 2. An amendment to the Constitution of India cannot be called into question by the Supreme Court of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Answer: Neither 1 nor 2
Consider the following statements: 1. If the election of the President of India is declared void by the Supreme Court of India, all acts done by him/her in the performance of duties of his/her office of President before the date of decision become invalid. 2. Election for the post of the President of India can be postponed on the ground that some Legislative Assemblies have been dissolved and elections are yet to take place. 3. When a Bill is presented to the President of India, the Constitution prescribes time limits within which he/she has to declare his/her assent. How many of the above statements are correct?
Answer: None
Medium (Judiciary and legal interpretations are recurring themes in UPSC, specific landmark judgments are important for all exams).
Statements made by witnesses in court, now including non-verbal communication like signs and gestures.
A person legally qualified to give evidence in court, whose testimony is considered reliable.
Necessary and appropriate modification and adjustments, not imposing a disproportionate or undue burden, where needed in a particular case, to ensure persons with disabilities enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms on an equal basis with others.
A witness who may require special measures to give their best evidence, such as children, victims of sexual offenses, or persons with disabilities.