Loading…
A US jury found Instagram and YouTube (platforms of Meta and Google) to be 'addictive by design'.
The ruling awarded $6 million in damages, holding Meta and Google liable for the harm caused.
Meta was assigned 70% of the liability, reflecting its primary role in the case.
This landmark decision could establish a significant precedent for future social media litigation, drawing parallels to 'big tobacco' lawsuits.
'Addictive by Design' refers to the deliberate incorporation of features and algorithms into products, such as social media platforms, to maximize user engagement and retention, often leading to compulsive use and potential addiction. Examples include infinite scroll, notification systems, and variable reward mechanisms. 'Corporate Liability' in this context means the legal responsibility of a company for the actions or inactions of its employees, or for the design of its products or services, that cause harm to others. This case expands liability to the inherent design of a product causing social and psychological harm.
Simple Analogy: Just as a car manufacturer is liable if a design flaw causes accidents, this ruling suggests a tech company can be liable if its platform's design flaw (addictiveness) causes psychological harm.
The case draws direct parallels to historical lawsuits against tobacco companies, which established corporate liability for health harms caused by intentionally addictive products.
The ruling underscores growing concerns about the impact of excessive social media use on mental health, particularly among adolescents, and the need for digital well-being initiatives.
This case highlights the evolving landscape of digital ethics and the increasing demand for regulatory frameworks to govern online platforms, data privacy, and user protection.
Traditionally holds manufacturers responsible for defective products. This case extends the definition of 'defect' to include addictive design causing psychological harm.
Aims to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive business practices and unsafe products. This ruling could influence how these laws apply to digital services.
GS-II: Governance, Social Justice (Welfare schemes for vulnerable sections, role of media and social networking sites); GS-III: Science & Technology (developments and their applications and effects in everyday life), Economy (corporate governance).
General Awareness (Current Affairs, Science & Technology).
General Awareness (Current Affairs, Digital Economy).
General Awareness (Current Affairs, Science & Technology).
General Awareness (Current Affairs, Social Issues).
Which of the following countries are well known as the two largest cocoa producers in the world?
Answer: Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana
Consider the following statements: 1. Jhelum River passes through Wular Lake. 2. Krishna River directly feeds Kolleru Lake. 3. Meandering of Gandak River formed Kanwar Lake. How many of the statements given above are correct?
Answer: Only two
Which one of the following is the best example of repeated falls in sea level, giving rise to present-day extensive marshland?
Answer: Rann of Kutch
Increasing, especially with growing concerns about tech impact on society and mental health.
Intentional features in products to maximize engagement, potentially leading to compulsive use.
Legal responsibility of a company for harm caused by its products or actions.
Moral principles governing the use of technology and digital platforms.
Legal responsibility of manufacturers for defective products causing injury.