The Union Cabinet on 20 August 2026 approved the establishment of a bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in the Union Territory of Ladakh.
The decision was announced by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who said it would spare litigants in Ladakh long journeys to reach the High Court.
The High Court presently functions from Srinagar and Jammu; the Ladakh bench will be its third location.
Parliament data dated 30 July 2026 recorded 44,557 cases pending before the High Court, of which more than 6,100 had been pending for over ten years.
Ladakh has been a separate Union Territory since 31 October 2019 under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, but has continued to share a High Court with Jammu and Kashmir.
There shall be a High Court for each State - the basic provision establishing High Courts.
Permits Parliament to establish a common High Court for two or more States, or for two or more States and a Union Territory - the model under which one court serves both Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
Created the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and of Ladakh with effect from 31 October 2019 and retained a common High Court for both.
Renamed the court as the 'High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh' in July 2021.
Access to justice has been read as part of the right to life and personal liberty, the constitutional basis for reducing distance-related barriers to courts.
The bench is the latest institutional consequence of the 2019 reorganisation, following the creation of the two Union Territories on 31 October 2019.
The 44,557 pending cases and the thin subordinate-court network in Ladakh are the standard indicators used in debates on judicial capacity and the National Judicial Infrastructure Authority proposal.
Other examples include the Guwahati High Court's jurisdiction over multiple north-eastern States and the common High Court for Punjab and Haryana, both illustrating the Article 231 model.
Supreme Court jurisprudence treating legal aid and effective access to courts as part of the right to life supplies the rationale for locating benches closer to litigants.
GS Paper II > Polity > Structure, organisation and functioning of the Judiciary
General Awareness > Indian Polity > Judiciary and Union Territories
General Awareness > National Current Affairs
General Awareness > Indian Polity
General Knowledge > Indian Polity and border Union Territories
An additional permanent sitting location of a High Court outside its principal seat, created to bring the court closer to litigants in distant parts of its jurisdiction.
A single High Court exercising jurisdiction over more than one State or Union Territory, permitted by Article 231 of the Constitution.
The main location at which a High Court sits; Srinagar and Jammu are the existing seats of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.