Former Congress MP Sajjan Kumar died on 20 August 2026 at the age of 80, while serving a life sentence for his role in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
He was brought from Tihar Jail to Safdarjung Hospital in Delhi and declared brought dead on arrival; hospital authorities did not immediately state the cause of death.
The Delhi High Court sentenced him to life imprisonment on 17 December 2018 for the killing of five Sikhs and the burning of a gurdwara at Raj Nagar in Delhi Cantonment.
A Delhi court presided over by Special Judge Kaveri Baweja awarded a second, concurrent life sentence on 25 February 2025 in another riot-related murder case.
He had represented the Outer Delhi Lok Sabha constituency three times, winning in 1980, 1991 and 2004.
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi is assassinated; anti-Sikh violence breaks out in Delhi and elsewhere over the following days.
The Union government appoints a one-man commission of inquiry headed by former Supreme Court judge G.T. Nanavati to examine the riots.
The Nanavati Commission submits its two-volume report; it is tabled in Parliament in August 2005.
The Delhi High Court convicts Sajjan Kumar and sentences him to life imprisonment in the Raj Nagar, Delhi Cantonment case involving five deaths and the burning of a gurdwara.
A Delhi court under Special Judge Kaveri Baweja awards a second, concurrent life sentence in another riot-related murder case.
A Delhi court acquits him in a separate 1984 violence case.
He is taken from Tihar Jail to Safdarjung Hospital and declared brought dead.
The statutory basis for commissions such as the Nanavati Commission, which are fact-finding bodies and do not themselves convict or sentence.
The second life sentence of February 2025 was ordered to run concurrently, meaning it was served alongside the existing sentence rather than beginning after it.
A High Court hearing an appeal against acquittal may reverse it and convict, as the Delhi High Court did in December 2018.
The highest court for the National Capital Territory of Delhi and the appellate forum over the district judiciary in Delhi.
The Nanavati Commission illustrates the standard exam point that a commission of inquiry is recommendatory, and its findings are not by themselves evidence of guilt in a criminal trial.
SITs are used to revive investigations that ordinary police work has closed, and appear repeatedly in questions on criminal justice reform.
A conviction 34 years after the offence is the classic illustration of the constitutional concern with speedy trial.
The chain of events from June 1984 to the assassination and the riots is standard modern-history and internal-security material.
GS Paper II > Polity and Governance > Judiciary, commissions of inquiry; GS Paper I > Post-independence consolidation
General Awareness > Current events, Indian polity
General Awareness > Current affairs
A fact-finding body appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, whose report is recommendatory and does not itself decide criminal liability.
A sentence served at the same time as an existing sentence rather than one beginning after it ends.
A dedicated investigating team constituted to re-examine cases, often those closed or poorly investigated earlier.